1952 Fiat 1400 vs. 2008 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (315 HP) has 272 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Mustang (441 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Fiat 1400. (88 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Fiat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Fiat 1400 | 2008 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 1400 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1394 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 315 HP |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
