1952 Fiat 1900 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Fiat 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1952 Fiat 1900.
Because 1952 Fiat 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Fiat 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Fiat 1900 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | 1900 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1598 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 55 L |
