1952 Fiat 500 vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1963 Ford Taunus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Taunus (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Taunus weights approximately 350 kg more than 1952 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 500 | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 500 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 31 L |