1952 Fiat 500 vs. 1966 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1966 Ford Falcon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Falcon weights approximately 509 kg more than 1952 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 500 | 1966 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 500 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 56 L |