1952 Fiat 500 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1952 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 500 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | 500 | 260 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2660 mm |