1952 Fiat 500 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 500.
Because 1952 Fiat 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Fiat 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 500 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 500 | Megane |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 70 L |