1952 Fiat 500 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1952 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Fiat 500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 500 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | 500 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 60 L |