1952 Fiat 8V vs. 1962 Seat 600
To start off, 1962 Seat 600 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 8V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 8V would be higher. At 1,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Fiat 8V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Fiat 8V (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Fiat 8V should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Fiat 8V weights approximately 355 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Fiat 8V (145 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Fiat 8V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Fiat 8V | 1962 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Fiat | Seat |
| Model | 8V | 600 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
