1952 Fiat 8V vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 8V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 8V would be higher. At 1,901 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Fiat 8V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Fiat 8V (106 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Fiat 8V should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 521 kg more than 1952 Fiat 8V.
Because 1952 Fiat 8V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Fiat 8V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat 8V | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | 8V | C30 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |