1952 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1966 Ford 12 M is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford 12 M (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 375 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat Campagnola | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | 12 M |
Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2530 mm |