1952 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1981 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1981 Mercury Cougar is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mercury Cougar (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 106 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat Campagnola | 1981 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Campagnola | Cougar |
Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2690 mm |