1952 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1983 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1983 Ford Fairlane is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Fairlane (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 380 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Fiat Campagnola | 1983 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Campagnola | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 4093 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2950 mm |
