1952 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2006 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2006 Fiat Panda is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Panda (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Panda weights approximately 125 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat Campagnola | 2006 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Fiat | Fiat |
Model | Campagnola | Panda |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2310 mm |