1952 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 114 kg more than 2009 Ford Ka.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Fiat Campagnola | 2009 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Campagnola | Ka |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2460 mm |
