1952 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 149 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Fiat Campagnola | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Fiat | Kia |
Model | Campagnola | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2660 mm |