1952 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Smart ForTwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Smart ForTwo has automatic transmission and 1952 Fiat Campagnola has manual transmission. 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Smart ForTwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Fiat Campagnola | 2012 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Fiat | Smart |
| Model | Campagnola | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
