1952 Ford 12 M vs. 1948 Simca 11
To start off, 1952 Ford 12 M is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 11 would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Simca 11 (60 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1948 Simca 11 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford 12 M | 1948 Simca 11 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | 12 M | 11 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1089 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2250 mm |
