1952 Ford 12 M vs. 1960 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1960 Hudson Metropolitan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Hudson Metropolitan (47 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Hudson Metropolitan should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 1960 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Ford | Hudson |
Model | 12 M | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2170 mm |