1952 Ford 12 M vs. 1968 Saab 99
To start off, 1968 Saab 99 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,709 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Saab 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Saab 99 (79 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Saab 99 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 1968 Saab 99 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | 12 M | 99 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1709 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2530 mm |