1952 Ford 12 M vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2320 mm |