1952 Ford 12 M vs. 1996 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 1996 Plymouth Voyager is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Plymouth Voyager (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Plymouth Voyager should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 1996 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | 12 M | Voyager |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |