1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2002 Toyota Mark II is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Mark II (157 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 2002 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2002 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | Mark II |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |