1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2003 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | 12 M | D-MAX |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3060 mm |