1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Musso is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 2003 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 SsangYong Musso has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 SsangYong Musso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2003 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | 12 M | Musso |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2640 mm |