1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (246 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | Murano |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 246 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2860 mm |