1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (158 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | 12 M | 75 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2750 mm |