1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |