1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2008 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,258 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford 12 M | 2008 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2258 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |
