1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford 12 M | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | 12 M | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3610 mm |
