1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,438 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (469 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 432 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 12 M | E |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2860 mm |