1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2011 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2011 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 2011 Subaru Tribeca is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Subaru Tribeca has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Subaru Tribeca will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford 12 M | 2011 Subaru Tribeca | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | 12 M | Tribeca |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2748 mm |
