1952 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XK is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XK (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 348 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford 12 M | 2012 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | 12 M | XK |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1328 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2751 mm |