1952 Ford Consul vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, both 1952 Ford Consul and 1952 Triumph Renown were released in the same year (1952). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Triumph Renown (66 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1952 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Triumph Renown should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 235 kg more than 1952 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Triumph Renown (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Ford Consul. (100 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1952 Triumph Renown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Consul | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Consul | Renown |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1508 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 66 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
