1952 Ford Consul vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1972 Ford GT 40 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Consul would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 310 more horse power than 1952 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Consul weights approximately 85 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Ford Consul (100 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1952 Ford Consul will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Consul | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Consul | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1508 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 350 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2420 mm |