1952 Ford Consul vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Consul would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1952 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Consul.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Consul. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Consul | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Consul | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1508 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4690 mm |