1952 Ford Consul vs. 1992 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1992 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Consul would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1992 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (239 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1952 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1952 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Ford Consul. (100 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Consul | 1992 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Consul | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1508 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |