1952 Ford Consul vs. 1996 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XJS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Consul would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 182 more horse power than 1952 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Consul.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Consul | 1996 Jaguar XJS | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Consul | XJS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1508 cc | 3978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 222 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |
