1952 Ford Consul vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Consul would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1952 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Consul.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Consul. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Ford Consul. (100 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Consul | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Consul | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1508 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3060 mm |
