1952 Ford Consul vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Consul would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP) has 220 more horse power than 1952 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 473 kg more than 1952 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Ford Consul. (100 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Ford Consul.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Ford Consul 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Ford Ford
Model Consul Mustang
Year Released 1952 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1508 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 40 HP 260 HP
Torque 100 Nm 411 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1045 kg 1518 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2630 mm