1952 Ford Consul vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Consul would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 340 kg more than 1952 Ford Consul.
Because 1952 Ford Consul is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Consul. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Ford Consul. (100 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Consul | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Consul | Countryman |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2595 mm |