1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1964 Triumph 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 310 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Crestline | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2700 mm |
