1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1967 Volvo 120
To start off, 1967 Volvo 120 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1967 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1967 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 466 kg more than 1967 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 1967 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Crestline | 120 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1014 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2610 mm |
