1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1972 Mazda 818
To start off, 1972 Mazda 818 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 480 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 1972 Mazda 818 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Crestline | 818 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2320 mm |
