1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1976 Renault Rodeo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 800 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Crestline | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2410 mm |
