1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1976 Zastava 132 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 385 kg more than 1976 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Crestline | 132 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2560 mm |