1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 670 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Crestline | Colt |
Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2310 mm |