1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1982 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1982 Lincoln Continental is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lincoln Continental (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 55 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Ford Crestline | 1982 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Crestline | Continental |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2760 mm |
