1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 385 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Crestline | 19 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2550 mm |