1952 Ford Crestline vs. 1999 Renault Laguna
To start off, 1999 Renault Laguna is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Laguna (138 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 196 kg more than 1999 Renault Laguna.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 1999 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Crestline | Laguna |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1284 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2680 mm |