1952 Ford Crestline vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Smart Roadster. (101 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Ford Crestline | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Crestline | Roadster |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2370 mm |